Thanks for checking out Nuclear Meltdown. If you will one day be an old person, subscribe!
This month, I read with interest a CNN piece about a 70-year-old American woman who moved to France. Apparently she was living on a rented horse ranch in Georgia, but decided there was more to life and relocated to a town called Fontainebleau.
There is no one in the world more sympathetic to this than me. I am not 70, but I do want to move to France. I have spent so much time reading about it on the internet, that my entire Facebook feed at this point is mostly just real estate listings for affordable French castles. Truly, I understand the appeal1.
But reading the CNN piece reminded me of one of my favorite posts I’ve written for this blog, which was titled “Grandparents have a job to do.” The argument was that older people have traditionally served as elders in their community, providing support and instruction for younger generations. A grandma might pass down family recipes or lore. A grandpa might teach his grandkids leatherwork or post driving. Elders may help co-parent, sure, but it’s a lot more than that. They might open professional doors for younger family members. They teach values. Getting old is inevitable, but being an elder is a proactive job. To be an elder is to assume the duty, responsibility, and shared obligation to hold the village together2.
But the reason I wrote “Grandparents have a job to do” is because I frequently get feedback from readers telling me that they don’t have an older generation filling this role. The elders are missing.
You can see this play out in the CNN piece, with the lady featured in the piece moving to France against the initial objections of her adult daughter. The daughter does eventually get on board and tells her mom to “go do what you want to go do.’” The mom replies, “‘Hey, that sounds good to me.’ So that’s what I did.”
The comments capture a kind of “Eat Pray Love” worldview that prioritizes personal desire, self interest, and individual fulfillment. It’s a philosophy that looks awesome from the perspective of the eater, pray-er and lover. But if you’re someone who gets left behind — say, an adult child — the eater, pray-er and lover starts looking a bit like a deadbeat.
Of course, not everyone who neglects their duty as an elder flees to another continent. My original post on this topic pointed to the Villages, a retirement community in Florida. And it sounds nice enough if you only look at the people playing pickleball all day. But if you think about the networks the Villagers abandoned it starts to look like an entire community of absentee elders.
This is a relatively common phenomenon, and for whatever reason I have recently seen an outpouring of people lamenting the lack of elders in their lives. Here, for example, is a woman who posts frequently about her mom’s lack of involvement in her kids’ lives.
Here’s a guy saying his kid’s grandmothers (on both sides) never visit despite easily having the ability to do so.
Here’s a guy lamenting that his parents “suck” as grandparents and act like it’s the “olympics to watch our child for an hour, two hours, three hours.” He adds, “Our parents had a freedom that they don’t provide to their children.”
And here’s the writer Stephanie H. Murray observing on Substack last month that one of the reasons so many parents and kids are addicted to technology is because they lack a village.
“To a great extent, tech (be it a snoo or a tablet) is being used to fill in not for absent or detached parents but for an absent and detached community,” Murray wrote.
I want to be clear that I’m not suggesting all grandparents, or older people generally, are dropping the ball. Some are doing fantastic things. Nevertheless, there does appear to be a very large cohort of younger and middle aged parents who are saying the older people in their lives are too focused on themselves to become elders.
Unfortunately, for a lot of folks that’s probably the end of the story. I cannot think of many ways to persuade people that spending time with loved ones is better than endless pickleball or whatever. If that is not self-evident, it’s a lost cause.
But I can prepare myself to be a better elder than those I see people complaining about on social media. One of the founding ideas of this blog was that I waited to have kids for more than a decade after getting married because I enjoyed my fancy-free urban professional lifestyle. Then when I finally had kids, I realized I had made a mistake by waiting so long, ultimately wasting many of my best years on superficiality and self-centeredness. I have lived two different lifestyles and found one of them — the one focused on family, duty, and community — to be superior.
At least for me, then, I hope to avoid the mistakes of my youth during my golden years. A move to France is tempting, but when I’m an old person I’ll have a job to do. And that’s why I’m writing this. Unfortunately, sometimes the only way to get a village is to start from scratch.
I understand that this may sound grim — who wants to do a “job” — and that’s probably why some push back. Here, for example, are a couple of grandmas arguing against the idea of familial obligation and duty. Many of the comments on these types of posts suggest that the idea of obligation to one’s juniors is a form of entitlement. I think this argument misses the core complaint people are expressing, which is often less about specific tasks (eg babysitting) than about isolation and community breakdown.
But more importantly, it fails to recognize that duty is a two-way street. You don’t invest in your village just for some abstract idea about what’s right or wrong. You invest in the your village because someday you will need that village. I saw this first hand when I had a weak village around the time my wife and I started having kids. I saw the fruits of my (in)action. I suspect I’ll need a village even more when I’m old, and I sure hope when that day comes some younger person feels a sense of obligation to keep me company. But I don’t see anyone jumping to do that labor if I’ve been too busy eating, praying and loving to assume the role of an elder.
Anyone is of course free to disagree, but I think the CNN article captures a likely outcome of a life sans obligation. It concludes by telling us that the lady who moved to France spends her time facilitating a “group focused on topics such as aging, being separated from families and grief.” The article also mentions that she started a YouTube channel to give herself a sense of purpose, because the alternative was playing with her dog and watching videos on YouTube all day.
This is all great stuff, and she’s probably making a positive difference in people’s lives.
But the image that I got from these details was not one of a person actually eating, praying and loving, but rather of someone who is spending much of their energy trying to abate the loneliness of a life spent doing “what you want.” Maybe that’s the best any of us can do. But for me, I’ll accept more obligation and less of what I want if there’s a chance doing so might mean I’m surrounded by the people I love.
Thanks for checking out Nuclear Meltdown. If you’ve enjoyed this blog, consider sharing it with a friend.
It kills me that there are entire castles listed for the same price that Zillow thinks I could get for my unremarkable old house in Salt Lake City. Here’s one, for example, that’s listed for roughly the same price I paid for my house five years ago. Here’s one for less than Zillow thinks my house is worth now. If you are a member of my extended family, I implore you once again to trade our overpriced little houses for literal castles in France. We can bring our entire village to somewhere more awesome.
I also wrote a companion piece arguing that non-old people also have a job to do, and that one of the reasons many of us lack the villages we desire is because we have failed to adequately invest in them. The point again being that duty is a two way street.
The two-way street thing reality of this is interesting to me. Or rather, which came first - the chicken or the egg - type of question? For instance, the Boomer generation had the benefit of that high-trust, familial society and then turned around and embraced a libertine individualism unlike anything seen before. (Paraphrasing from Louise Perry's incredible piece "We Will All Become Boring")
So, a lot of the messaging Millenials received was to do the same, family ties and proximity be damned. And we did. We moved away for college and work and then found spouses far from where we grew up or whatever. And now a lot of that can't be turned around and a proximate village remade again. So in my case, my family and in-laws are always eager to visit from hours or states away, but we will never have them as elders in our daily life unless either my husband and I move toward one of them (and we'd have to choose, and the niche field my husband is in makes that difficult).... or they move to us (also difficult but not impossible.)
What am I saying here? haha I suppose the whole ethos of doing what's best for *you* started further back than the current grandparents simply not being involved in the present moment (sure, it sounds like some honestly are awful even when they live nearby!) But the whole life trajectory many were raised to see as normal and good is ending up a pretty sucky deal for raising a family. And I suppose we as the current parents are implicated to some degree. When the messaging is to prioritize yourself and your desires ("don't let us get in the way!", that plays out for both the younger and older generations in different ways.
Attention: Village builders must prepare in advance for the reality that all people are difficult.
You must prepare in advance for the day when a neighbor does something that will tempt you to say, "Oh, now I know who they REALLY are."
Good people are going to do things that will make you sick with knowing that you've just been attacked; and there will be no way out except 1) war, or 2) to see the situation with their eyes, to forgive what happened/was said to the best of your ability, to retain the most basic civility (saying hello in passing, for example), and to refrain from dragging other "villagers" into the conflict. Even if you tell your story, you must not isolate the offender; and he must not try to isolate you. Six months will pass, or a year, and the baseline of "hello" will turn into something different, perhaps with a conversation and a more advanced stage of forgiveness. (It helps if he eventually needs something from you and must ask for it, or vice-versa.)
I have experienced--and heard tales of--attempts at village building out here in the mountains where I live (in France! haha. Small house / not a castle). Every story ends the same way, and I mean the same way: There is a conflict, the plenitude of a person is reduced into the fact of an offence, and the relationship is over. Over the course of a few years, most people are no longer speaking with most people, and maybe there are a few little factions that survive.
All the people of the village (or wide neighborhood) are good. Their values are the same, and their ideas are largely complementary. They clear footpaths together, help each other with building, even speak the same spiritual language--more or less.
They are friends. But maybe they start irritating each other over time, or some people take too much...eventually there's a blow-up: Serious matters like property disputes and infidelity, or petty final straws like a disagreement over the alleged synchronicity of an alienated third party's sudden phone call.
My husband says these village relationships should not be based on friendship. One of our neighbors similarly proposes that they should be based on mutual need, to the point that no one owns by himself even all the tools he uses.
I say, there's truth in these thoughts, because 1) Brotherhood is more fundamental than friendship, less exclusive, and also our reality, and 2) The physical fact of your need for help forces you to check the ego, which fantasizes relentlessly about becoming invulnerable through independence--just one of its siren calls. Let these villages be based on what you want, but at least with the understanding that you will offend and will be offended, and it will be painful indeed. To not choose war is powerfully effective but can feel most unnatural, especially in the most serious cases.
I'll be turning into an elder, soon. This is one of the things I've learned, that I'll be helping with. Even if I'm a human with continuing blindnesses, this is something I see better than the average young person.
PS I appreciated some of the other commenters touching upon this same theme.